Certified Treecare Safety Professional (CTSP) Practice Exam

To set up a "zero-exposure" safety incentive plan, which measure would be the fairest for comparing hazard exposure among crews?

1. Employee surveys

2. Safety training completion

3. Accident investigation reports

4. Incident reporting rates

The correct answer is: Accident investigation reports

Utilizing accident investigation reports as a measure for comparing hazard exposure among crews is the most effective choice for establishing a "zero-exposure" safety incentive plan. This approach provides concrete, documented evidence of incidents that occurred, detailing the circumstances surrounding each accident. It enables a precise understanding of how safety protocols are followed and where lapses may occur, allowing for assessment of exposure to hazards. When looking at the broader context of safety, the data from accident investigation reports can reveal trends and underlying issues affecting crew safety. This information forms a solid base for creating an environment that prioritizes risk management and safety compliance, which is crucial for fostering a "zero-exposure" philosophy. Other measures, while potentially informative, do not provide the same level of specificity regarding actual hazard exposure. Employee surveys might capture perceptions of safety but do not reliably reflect the reality of workplace conditions. Safety training completion indicates that employees are educated on safety practices but does not ensure that those practices are implemented effectively in the field. Incident reporting rates, while useful for understanding the frequency of reports, can be influenced by varying levels of reporting diligence among crews and may not accurately represent the true hazard exposure. Therefore, the use of accident investigation reports stands out as the most objective and effective method for comparing safety